Soura2112
Apr 20, 02:25 PM
Thanks for the info on your camcorders and 5.1..
I was not getting the cam for 5.1 just happeneds to come with it.
I was not getting the cam for 5.1 just happeneds to come with it.
nyfliiboy
Apr 30, 11:40 AM
That quality is impressive
whitenoise
Apr 18, 07:01 PM
If I may, I'll add my question in here.
I've just had an awful time trying to put on the Cygnett OpticClear screen protector.
I cleaned everything down got started and somehow managed to attract some specks of dust. I did the tape thing, but ended up making more of a mess of things, and adding more specks to the screen :( - I had a similar nightmare putting the screen protector on my original iPad, but it worked out okay in the end.
I've ended up trying several times, but just can't get it to apply without problems, so I finally tried to clean the back with water. This seemed to get the little specks, so I tried to do an install while it was still wettish and just can't seem to get that right either. I think I may have screwed it up altogether, and will just go without the protector this time, (even though it cost me for this one.)
Any tricks? or is it just a case of too much dust floating around? (I promise the room isn't covered in dust, btw!) :rolleyes:
thanks
I've just had an awful time trying to put on the Cygnett OpticClear screen protector.
I cleaned everything down got started and somehow managed to attract some specks of dust. I did the tape thing, but ended up making more of a mess of things, and adding more specks to the screen :( - I had a similar nightmare putting the screen protector on my original iPad, but it worked out okay in the end.
I've ended up trying several times, but just can't get it to apply without problems, so I finally tried to clean the back with water. This seemed to get the little specks, so I tried to do an install while it was still wettish and just can't seem to get that right either. I think I may have screwed it up altogether, and will just go without the protector this time, (even though it cost me for this one.)
Any tricks? or is it just a case of too much dust floating around? (I promise the room isn't covered in dust, btw!) :rolleyes:
thanks
kalex
Apr 26, 10:49 PM
Now that VPN does not work directly from the iPad, Instead of jail breaking your device and hacking on some illegal source (which they can make some validation code later that you cannot hack in yourself). Why not connect to a vpn'd tether (iphone / android device). Essentially it is the same thing but the IOS api cannot account for if the device being connected through vpn.
Its not going to work that way. cablevision fixed their 1.0.1 app that it doesn't connect via ipad's VPN. how is it going to work while being tethered to your iphone?
Its not going to work that way. cablevision fixed their 1.0.1 app that it doesn't connect via ipad's VPN. how is it going to work while being tethered to your iphone?
dashiel
Oct 25, 12:18 AM
resolution independence is going to be a god send to web developers, no more crappy and inaccurate pixel/em sizes. now we'll be able to specify inches and picas hoorah!
and vista will be supporting resolution independence through its WPF foundation layer. it won't be overnight � hell like CSS 2.1 it'll take years before it goes mainstream, but the web is going to be a much better place.
as for JPEGs at 72 dpi vs resolution independence � beyond the scaling algorithms it's important to look at the increase in resolutions of monitors before going to crazy, 1920x1200 is about the maximum and average consumer is going to have, it's taken a few years from 1024x768 to get there though, three or four at least. i suspect we'll be at a max ratio of 2:1 or maybe 3:1 for quite some time. i don't think we're going to see a drastic need for hi-res images on the web or a plethora of "blurry" images for quite some time.
and vista will be supporting resolution independence through its WPF foundation layer. it won't be overnight � hell like CSS 2.1 it'll take years before it goes mainstream, but the web is going to be a much better place.
as for JPEGs at 72 dpi vs resolution independence � beyond the scaling algorithms it's important to look at the increase in resolutions of monitors before going to crazy, 1920x1200 is about the maximum and average consumer is going to have, it's taken a few years from 1024x768 to get there though, three or four at least. i suspect we'll be at a max ratio of 2:1 or maybe 3:1 for quite some time. i don't think we're going to see a drastic need for hi-res images on the web or a plethora of "blurry" images for quite some time.
color guy
Oct 8, 09:41 AM
"Who's your carrier"?
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/cellphone-complaints-705/index.htm
Mirrors my experience.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/cellphone-complaints-705/index.htm
Mirrors my experience.
zelmo
Sep 11, 05:17 PM
Seems like most people don't want to see the footage ever again. I suppose I understand, as it is very traumatic to watch. I have a CNN DVD that has a bunch of footage from that day and the days following, which my wife and I have watched every year since on 9/11. I imagine we'll pop it in again tonight once the boy has been put to bed.
It's disturbing to see it all again, particularly the people jumping from the upper floors, but I don't ever want to forget how the events of that day made me feel.
It's disturbing to see it all again, particularly the people jumping from the upper floors, but I don't ever want to forget how the events of that day made me feel.
MaxBurn
May 3, 04:01 PM
Oh sorry, i see you are on a mac so i do t know.
benhollberg
Apr 25, 09:25 PM
Try clearing your cache and cookies. Also, check any adblockers you may have running.
I have tried all that, I did the reset Safari, but unchecked the reset top sites box, and disabled ClickToFlash. That is the only extension I have running regularly, the other is Twitter but I don't use it ever and it is always disabled. The first thing I thought was my IP Address was being blocked from the servers because I could access the site on everything via Clear or AT&T on my iPhone, the site just won't work on my home network.
I have tried all that, I did the reset Safari, but unchecked the reset top sites box, and disabled ClickToFlash. That is the only extension I have running regularly, the other is Twitter but I don't use it ever and it is always disabled. The first thing I thought was my IP Address was being blocked from the servers because I could access the site on everything via Clear or AT&T on my iPhone, the site just won't work on my home network.
wordmunger
Nov 4, 07:34 AM
Considering it is the Dock and not The Dock, why does the title include 'the' in the first place?
Well, it doesn't any more. Who knows why it did before.
Well, it doesn't any more. Who knows why it did before.
bafonso
Apr 12, 02:41 PM
Every time I read these threads I'm reminded why I don't have an iphone. Yeah, I have many other Apple devices, including a 3G iPad, but no iphone. I refuse to be a slave to the man. I wish subsidized devices didn't exist in this country. It reduces competition by locking people into contracts and ultimately holds technology back. Yeah, more people can own the "coolest" phone, but IMHO the ends don't justify the means.
This has been very frustrating for me too. I am disgusted that neither t-mobile or at&t have a pay as you go with data plan like the one for the ipad 3g. I would get an old 3gs or something and use it like that. I don't really make many calls so data is what I would use for email, etc.
This is possible is every freaking country in the world except in the US. I can't believe people tolerate this... it's a carrier dictatorship by any standards. I refuse to pay 60$us for a monthly bill when all I want is 25$us/2gig plus minutes I buy.
This has been very frustrating for me too. I am disgusted that neither t-mobile or at&t have a pay as you go with data plan like the one for the ipad 3g. I would get an old 3gs or something and use it like that. I don't really make many calls so data is what I would use for email, etc.
This is possible is every freaking country in the world except in the US. I can't believe people tolerate this... it's a carrier dictatorship by any standards. I refuse to pay 60$us for a monthly bill when all I want is 25$us/2gig plus minutes I buy.
daneoni
May 4, 08:22 PM
PRAM/NVRAM has nothing to do with fans, power, or the OP's issues. SMC does.
I'm also loosing control from the trackpad.
Resetting I/O which the trackpad is part off might help no?
I'm also loosing control from the trackpad.
Resetting I/O which the trackpad is part off might help no?
jbyun04
Aug 31, 05:15 PM
wicked! people around in my area are still trying to get $150 for theirs
Designer Dale
Dec 9, 09:03 PM
I remember exactly where I was when I heard that. I shot home after work for the news. Walther Cronkite always handled pain so well.
Dale
ps: Who is/was dimebag??
Dale
ps: Who is/was dimebag??
Coleman2010
Apr 18, 05:13 AM
Do US carriers offer a similar unlock service does one always have to go 3rd party.(might as well jailbreak while your at it, to further enjoy your $170 spend):confused:
ATT does not offer unlocks for the iPhone 4. That is why we're willing to pay $170 for it. And yes, I have my phone jailbroken as well.
ATT does not offer unlocks for the iPhone 4. That is why we're willing to pay $170 for it. And yes, I have my phone jailbroken as well.
Yvan256
Aug 7, 10:07 PM
1. Apple officially announces that Boot Camp will be part of Leopard.
2. VMWare announces their product for OS X.
3. Microsoft kills VPC for Mac as it becomes pointless and sort of redundant.
After all, if they can sell the regular version of Windows to intel Mac users, why bother wasting money on something other companies are doing (VMWare and Parallels).
You want Windows on your Mac, use Boot Camp/buy VMWare or Parallels and then buy Windows like everyone else. No extra R&D funds/time required to enter the "Mac market", which thanks to Boot Camp is "all intel Mac users".
It's a simple business decision.
Yeah, this joke has been around forever. It originally was used when Windows 95 first came out. It isn't technically valid for NT, 2000, XP, or Vista. Those are just 32-bit (or 64-bit) OSes by a 2 bit company. :-D
Well, how about "Windows Vista: a 64-bit OS that can almost emulate a 32 bit shell running on a 16 bit extension of an 8 bit OS designed for a 4 bit CPU, made by a 2 bit company that can't stand one bit of competition."? ;-)
2. VMWare announces their product for OS X.
3. Microsoft kills VPC for Mac as it becomes pointless and sort of redundant.
After all, if they can sell the regular version of Windows to intel Mac users, why bother wasting money on something other companies are doing (VMWare and Parallels).
You want Windows on your Mac, use Boot Camp/buy VMWare or Parallels and then buy Windows like everyone else. No extra R&D funds/time required to enter the "Mac market", which thanks to Boot Camp is "all intel Mac users".
It's a simple business decision.
Yeah, this joke has been around forever. It originally was used when Windows 95 first came out. It isn't technically valid for NT, 2000, XP, or Vista. Those are just 32-bit (or 64-bit) OSes by a 2 bit company. :-D
Well, how about "Windows Vista: a 64-bit OS that can almost emulate a 32 bit shell running on a 16 bit extension of an 8 bit OS designed for a 4 bit CPU, made by a 2 bit company that can't stand one bit of competition."? ;-)
arn
May 11, 11:30 PM
Originally posted by dukestreet
Ah, sounds great. I'm glad you're acknowledging the MacRumors Community, giving it a vote of confidence.
One question for you Arn. When you first started this site, would have expected it to have turned into what you see today or were you hoping for something else?
Overall, I like how things have turned out...
Ideally, I would like to be able to put more time into the design/graphics of the site... but it does what it needs to at the moment.
In terms of functionality, I would have liked it to be a bit more easily trackable - rumor wise... with perhaps the latest rumors available on specific topics, as well as a more easily searchable database.... but that comes with time and some coding.... and I'll get to it... maybe by MWNY, we'll have things a bit better...
overall, I'm pretty pleased though, and enjoy the rumor community.
arn
Ah, sounds great. I'm glad you're acknowledging the MacRumors Community, giving it a vote of confidence.
One question for you Arn. When you first started this site, would have expected it to have turned into what you see today or were you hoping for something else?
Overall, I like how things have turned out...
Ideally, I would like to be able to put more time into the design/graphics of the site... but it does what it needs to at the moment.
In terms of functionality, I would have liked it to be a bit more easily trackable - rumor wise... with perhaps the latest rumors available on specific topics, as well as a more easily searchable database.... but that comes with time and some coding.... and I'll get to it... maybe by MWNY, we'll have things a bit better...
overall, I'm pretty pleased though, and enjoy the rumor community.
arn
chicagdan
Oct 4, 09:11 AM
i guess i am the only one that finds this a bit wierd. and rubs me the wrong way. so somewhere in googles databases my life is recorded on where and when i was there? i bet the government would love to get a handle on that.
:(
Yep, I'm with you on that. It already bugs me that my Prius has a black box for accidents and a GPS built in (for the nav system.) Why do we *trust* this government to not ask companies to turn that information over (just like they asked for our phone records) and for these corporations getting billions in tax incentives to eagerly comply? Now if you carry a GPS, government will be able to know where you are at any moment. I'm not buying it unless Apple includes a pledge with the product that they will fight to protect my legal rights if any government agency asks for these records without probable cause.
:(
Yep, I'm with you on that. It already bugs me that my Prius has a black box for accidents and a GPS built in (for the nav system.) Why do we *trust* this government to not ask companies to turn that information over (just like they asked for our phone records) and for these corporations getting billions in tax incentives to eagerly comply? Now if you carry a GPS, government will be able to know where you are at any moment. I'm not buying it unless Apple includes a pledge with the product that they will fight to protect my legal rights if any government agency asks for these records without probable cause.
tazinlwfl
Apr 20, 04:34 PM
They asked the right question about LTE -- just didn't get the answer I wanted to hear.
but what do you expect? For them to say "Yes, we LOVE LTE and we can't wait to show you our new iPhone with LTE!"...
... if only.
but what do you expect? For them to say "Yes, we LOVE LTE and we can't wait to show you our new iPhone with LTE!"...
... if only.
pgwalsh
Jul 29, 05:32 PM
I assume you referring to streaming music using iTunes. If so, I'm pretty sure not being able to play purchased music is part of the DRM. However, if your computer is authorized to play the songs purchased by the account that bought them, then I think it lets you stream them. For the purchased music, I'd recommend moving one of them onto your computer and authorizing it for playback. Then you'll be able to stream all the others bought with the same account. Or, you could just copy all the purchased files, and stop streaming them.Well that's all find and dandy, but if you want to share your purchased music with your office so they can listent to your library, your out of luck.. That's sad and should be fixed..
MacCoaster
Sep 29, 02:37 PM
Originally posted by onemoof
I have a dual processor 867.
I opened up Terminal and typed in "machine" then return.
It output the following line "ppc7450".
Doesn't sound like 7455 to me
It *IS* a 7455. Trust me. DP800 and its series [733, 867, DP800] were 7450. January's DP1GHz series were first 7455s. It's still 7455 right now. Though the 7455 in 1.25 appears to be 7455A... but the question still stands... true DDR signaling?
Edit: whoops, logic didnt match up... corrected DP800 and older to DP800 and its series
I have a dual processor 867.
I opened up Terminal and typed in "machine" then return.
It output the following line "ppc7450".
Doesn't sound like 7455 to me
It *IS* a 7455. Trust me. DP800 and its series [733, 867, DP800] were 7450. January's DP1GHz series were first 7455s. It's still 7455 right now. Though the 7455 in 1.25 appears to be 7455A... but the question still stands... true DDR signaling?
Edit: whoops, logic didnt match up... corrected DP800 and older to DP800 and its series
frunkis54
Apr 2, 03:24 PM
I've not ever seen pop-ups on this site in the 2 years I've been visiting.
Could it be from another site you might have up in the background?
nope it was definatly this site. i refreshed a few times and haven't seen it since so im better now :)
Could it be from another site you might have up in the background?
nope it was definatly this site. i refreshed a few times and haven't seen it since so im better now :)
AppleIntelRock
Oct 8, 03:00 AM
!!!!!!!! the apple store is down!
it must be the iphone :D
http://www.store.apple.com/
it must be the iphone :D
http://www.store.apple.com/
SkippyThorson
Mar 11, 02:18 PM
Is your Macquarium finished? Care to shoot along a picture? Love to see your results of the finished product!
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий