ucfgrad93
Jan 4, 09:11 PM
That is very sad. :(
strider42
Oct 17, 01:11 PM
Originally posted by xrhajj
Not really...because earlier in the month I posted a similar thread....stating that it would be cool if we had an iPod with bluetooth built in for wireless head sets and remote.....so the whole point of this thread is that the tecnology to make this happend is coming :D :p
that idea however, has nothing to do with bluetooth enabling the hard drive. and I still wonder if using radio transmission might be a better alternative for such things (I have no idea). Maybe the remote would be coolas a bluetooth device.
Not really...because earlier in the month I posted a similar thread....stating that it would be cool if we had an iPod with bluetooth built in for wireless head sets and remote.....so the whole point of this thread is that the tecnology to make this happend is coming :D :p
that idea however, has nothing to do with bluetooth enabling the hard drive. and I still wonder if using radio transmission might be a better alternative for such things (I have no idea). Maybe the remote would be coolas a bluetooth device.
Cify
Apr 10, 07:30 PM
What program should I use to try to get this to work with windows 7?
I'm also wondering what to put instead of optimum.net if I'm on Time Warner.
I'm also wondering what to put instead of optimum.net if I'm on Time Warner.
dmr727
May 1, 01:07 PM
I don't know why I was thinking it started with a 'P'. Now that I know the name, I feel like I should have known!
Maybe you were thinking Performa - Apple's line of Macintosh that had AtEase preinstalled.
Maybe you were thinking Performa - Apple's line of Macintosh that had AtEase preinstalled.
MacMadeInHeaven
Apr 1, 08:04 AM
Why you ignore my post you wankers!!!!?:mad:
jvmxtra
Apr 13, 10:44 PM
hows the quality compare to when you stream at home? Assuming vpn connection to the internet is slower
kcdude
May 1, 08:27 PM
1
Coleman2010
Apr 27, 04:59 AM
Its not going to work that way. cablevision fixed their 1.0.1 app that it doesn't connect via ipad's VPN. how is it going to work while being tethered to your iphone?
He's thinking that the app checks if there is a VPN connection on the iPad. If the connection is done on an iPhone then tethered to the iPad it wouldn't see a VPN connection on the iPad.
He's thinking that the app checks if there is a VPN connection on the iPad. If the connection is done on an iPhone then tethered to the iPad it wouldn't see a VPN connection on the iPad.
iFiend
May 4, 07:57 AM
It's a version of Barrel with beta animations what i installed.I've uninstalled it from Cydia but it's still in Settings :confused:
Go to Library/PreferenceBundles/Preferences and delete everything related to Barrel. Let me know if that works because if it doesn't I have another idea.
Go to Library/PreferenceBundles/Preferences and delete everything related to Barrel. Let me know if that works because if it doesn't I have another idea.
Kunigit
Mar 18, 11:08 PM
How many people are there now?
DeaconGraves
Mar 29, 05:47 PM
OP is the same guy trolling over here: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1127611 Take what he says with a grain of microscopic salt.
-Ken-
Mar 20, 10:28 PM
Thanks for the quick reply!
redeye be
Feb 15, 03:34 PM
Don't have a product recomendation ready but looks like u will deffinetly need a document feeder. I have a flatbed scanner without feeder and wouldn't even dare to dream about scanning 100+ pages on the same day :eek:
As for the usb, i don't think u should be concerned. A 2.0 scanner will work with your 1.0 PB ( :confused: - mine does ;) )
You will however need good OCR software (could be in the package, could be the package sucks)
Cheers and good luck searching.
As for the usb, i don't think u should be concerned. A 2.0 scanner will work with your 1.0 PB ( :confused: - mine does ;) )
You will however need good OCR software (could be in the package, could be the package sucks)
Cheers and good luck searching.
Peterkro
Feb 27, 10:23 AM
The US signed the treaty too.
Clinton signed Bush unsigned.:rolleyes:
I think in 2017 wars of aggression will come under the treaty,something that would have seen both Bushes,Blair,Clinton and many others hauled in front of the court.
Clinton signed Bush unsigned.:rolleyes:
I think in 2017 wars of aggression will come under the treaty,something that would have seen both Bushes,Blair,Clinton and many others hauled in front of the court.
matticus008
Oct 26, 06:25 PM
For those that currently use iTMS, the presence of other music providers supplying and actively marketing "iPod compatible" tracks will create competition that Apple currently don't have. This will drive prices down, or force Apple to add value to their own offerings. (For those that don't buy via iTMS, instead choosing to rip CDs or use P2P networks, it makes no difference either way).
This assumes that Apple sets prices and controls content. It really doesn't--the store is barely above break-even, and Apple owns none of the content. Competition only weakens Apple's bargaining power with the RIAA, which in turn will drive prices UP. We've already seen them try.
For the broader market, increased availabilty of "iPod compatible" tracks from various suppliers can only enhance the iPods appeal. Clearly it would be preferable for Apple to licence their actual DRM to other suppliers, but they won't. This is a happy workaround.
What is the inherent "good" in being able to buy Fairplay tracks from other vendors? Purely that lower prices might happen on other websites (with high startup costs and bad licensing positions with the RIAA, making this "lower price" for mainstream music almost impossible)? The only advantage I can see is for small indie labels, who might provide high-quality DRMed files for good prices. This of course would be good for everyone, but it's not exactly a huge market.
This assumes that Apple sets prices and controls content. It really doesn't--the store is barely above break-even, and Apple owns none of the content. Competition only weakens Apple's bargaining power with the RIAA, which in turn will drive prices UP. We've already seen them try.
For the broader market, increased availabilty of "iPod compatible" tracks from various suppliers can only enhance the iPods appeal. Clearly it would be preferable for Apple to licence their actual DRM to other suppliers, but they won't. This is a happy workaround.
What is the inherent "good" in being able to buy Fairplay tracks from other vendors? Purely that lower prices might happen on other websites (with high startup costs and bad licensing positions with the RIAA, making this "lower price" for mainstream music almost impossible)? The only advantage I can see is for small indie labels, who might provide high-quality DRMed files for good prices. This of course would be good for everyone, but it's not exactly a huge market.
Doctor Q
Jan 1, 02:48 PM
Look farther down, and it says
< Contact Us - Mac Rumors - Mac News - Daily Tunes >
with links to all three.
< Contact Us - Mac Rumors - Mac News - Daily Tunes >
with links to all three.
eawmp1
May 4, 06:59 AM
Happy Birthday!
How about you ask for Apple Store gift cards in the amount of the Classic and see what transpires in September/October?
How about you ask for Apple Store gift cards in the amount of the Classic and see what transpires in September/October?
MBA13
Apr 24, 07:19 PM
10.6.5 I got it 3 days ago :D
If you still have 10.6.5 could you click on about your Mac, more info, and post your firmware (example shown above).
Thanks!!
If you still have 10.6.5 could you click on about your Mac, more info, and post your firmware (example shown above).
Thanks!!
Lars Petersen
Dec 24, 05:04 AM
Thank's for a quick reply.
Actually, every TV makes this noise when they are on, but not all people hear it. But i have never heard it with a pc before, when it is turned OFF?
Actually, every TV makes this noise when they are on, but not all people hear it. But i have never heard it with a pc before, when it is turned OFF?
iserian
Mar 30, 11:14 PM
Yep. That is why the viphone did not sell through... Verizon customers have lots of excellent choices when it comes to smart phones. No question if you are using a late model top tier android device like the dx it is Painful going back to a viphone. Add to that real 12Mbit plus downloads only on Verizon and only on android phones and apples offerings are not even in the game. A viphone 5 with lte would make it a bit more interesting but I'm not holding my breath. Buddy has a Atrix on atandt and gets 300 down.... its pitiful.
The viphone kills in video conferencing though....
Not sure what "issues" you're having, but I've had 4.3 (never seen it called "4.3.0" since there's no such thing, Math 101), but I don't have gyro issues, and my battery life is fantastic. I can't say I use facetime much, but when I have I've had no issues. Sounds like you might have a device issue, not a widespread OS issue. When Apple released 4.3, it was widely understood that it was released to plug the jailbreak.... tho it seems for many that "issues" suddenly are realized when Apple releases a "fix" ... I have a feeling that you're the type that if Apple releases 4.3.2 to fix "volume issues" you'll suddenly complain that you hate 4.3.1 because of the volume bug, even though you'd never mentioned it until they said they're fixing it. That's the type of person psychics prey on... lol.
This is why I ditched iPhone and went to Android 2 months ago. I got sick of the waiting game for jailbreaks. I have no right to a jailbreak, I just wanted it sooner, and the devs have had a harder and harder time making it happen for every OS release. Android on the other hand, has everything I jailbreak for already built into the OS... widgets, better multitasking, personal hotspot (not ad-hoc crap, etc). I bought an iPad assuming the chatter about "it's almost here" from 3 weeks ago wouldn't be like the Christmas promises that didn't come through till February for iPhone, but again I was disappointed.
Again, I don't feel entitled to something, my frustration isn't with the Dev Team, it's with Apple. They're focusing sooooo much energy on fighting jailbreaking that Android has focused the same time on building the features and OS that users want. If this thing doesn't come out in the next week this iPad is going back. Apple already lost me in the phone business, guess they want to alienate me as a tablet customer too?
Ok, queue the Apple fanboy flamers... it's fine, I can take it. I speak from reality not fanaticism. 1 year ago iOS owned the market, now Android does. Give it one more year and it won't even be close if Apple continues to treat customers like prisoners. That didn't work out well for them in the 80s, which gave MSFT the ammo they needed to permanently take the market, and this isn't panning out any different.
The viphone kills in video conferencing though....
Not sure what "issues" you're having, but I've had 4.3 (never seen it called "4.3.0" since there's no such thing, Math 101), but I don't have gyro issues, and my battery life is fantastic. I can't say I use facetime much, but when I have I've had no issues. Sounds like you might have a device issue, not a widespread OS issue. When Apple released 4.3, it was widely understood that it was released to plug the jailbreak.... tho it seems for many that "issues" suddenly are realized when Apple releases a "fix" ... I have a feeling that you're the type that if Apple releases 4.3.2 to fix "volume issues" you'll suddenly complain that you hate 4.3.1 because of the volume bug, even though you'd never mentioned it until they said they're fixing it. That's the type of person psychics prey on... lol.
This is why I ditched iPhone and went to Android 2 months ago. I got sick of the waiting game for jailbreaks. I have no right to a jailbreak, I just wanted it sooner, and the devs have had a harder and harder time making it happen for every OS release. Android on the other hand, has everything I jailbreak for already built into the OS... widgets, better multitasking, personal hotspot (not ad-hoc crap, etc). I bought an iPad assuming the chatter about "it's almost here" from 3 weeks ago wouldn't be like the Christmas promises that didn't come through till February for iPhone, but again I was disappointed.
Again, I don't feel entitled to something, my frustration isn't with the Dev Team, it's with Apple. They're focusing sooooo much energy on fighting jailbreaking that Android has focused the same time on building the features and OS that users want. If this thing doesn't come out in the next week this iPad is going back. Apple already lost me in the phone business, guess they want to alienate me as a tablet customer too?
Ok, queue the Apple fanboy flamers... it's fine, I can take it. I speak from reality not fanaticism. 1 year ago iOS owned the market, now Android does. Give it one more year and it won't even be close if Apple continues to treat customers like prisoners. That didn't work out well for them in the 80s, which gave MSFT the ammo they needed to permanently take the market, and this isn't panning out any different.
Goldinboy17
May 1, 11:27 PM
Edit.
StarbucksSam
Dec 12, 10:11 AM
Call me shallow (and lazy!) but it would be nice if you could post a few pics to go along with your review.
I don't have a digital camera. ;)
I don't have a digital camera. ;)
tbluhp
Apr 29, 08:20 AM
Can you unlock the settings via the small lock on the bottom right?
Can you add a user (Everyone) and change permissions?
no
Can you add a user (Everyone) and change permissions?
no
edgarf28
Mar 25, 12:26 PM
Download links please?
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий